Andy Lopez, 2000-2013

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

pt.2013.11.13_Andy
 
Community erupts after deputy kills 13-year-old carrying a toy gun
Drum beats and Aztec dancers led hundreds of chanting people on an evening march from the Latino neighborhood of Roseland to the downtown square of Santa Rosa, California, October 30. They demanded justice for the killing of 13-year-old Andy Lopez by sheriff’s deputy Erick Gelhaus.
It was the eighth consecutive day of mourning and action. The killing has ignited the Latino community in California’s wine-rich Sonoma County, supported by many others, as if Andy were their own. Gelhaus, on a routine patrol, pumped seven bullets into Andy’s young body a mere 10 seconds after calling in a “suspicious person” from his squad car.
“Suspicious?” Why? Because he was a brown-skinned youth walking in the neighborhood where he was born? Because he was wearing a “hoodie,” as was African-American teenager Trayvon Martin when he was murdered in Florida? Gelhaus felt Andy was a “threat” — he was carrying a toy rifle to a friend’s house.
A combat veteran of the Iraq War, Gelhaus says he thought the toy gun — a plastic AK-47 replica — was real. But the deputy with him did not fire. “Sheriff Wanted 4 Murder” read signs on fences in Latino neighborhoods and at rallies.
Prayer vigils, a funeral, marches, and rallies have all been attended by hundreds of local residents — Anglo, Black, and Asian, as well as Latino. More than a thousand attended at least two.
“Andy was nice and kind. He tried to make everyone laugh,” a classmate testified at the October 30 rally. “He loved basketball and boxing,” added another from his school.
The day before, the largest march had consisted largely of Latino middle-school, high-school, and junior-college students. They were met at the Sheriff’s Office by deputies in full riot gear and armed and with cameras on roofs with a helicopter circling as if in a war zone. No arrests of the peaceful demonstrators occurred.
A spontaneous demonstration of high-school and middle-school students had closed down the Sheriff’s Office a week before. Community leaders are applauding their energy and initiative. “A lot of young Martin Luther Kings are being born today,” observes Alicia Sanchez of KBBF bilingual radio.
Most elected officials of both Sonoma County and Santa Rosa have refused to speak out and have even shut their offices and public hearings to constituents wanting to express their concerns. The Santa Rosa School District encouraged students not to go to the Tuesday march, where they could practice their constitutionally-guaranteed rights of free speech and free assembly.
Local police departments are in charge of the investigation — each investigates the other in a killing like this. The FBI has also gotten involved. But many are calling for an independent civilian review board. The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights recommended one for Sonoma County after a killing in 1999. That has not happened yet.
Gelhaus sees law enforcement as a “contact sport,” according to articles that he wrote for SWAT magazine. “Today is the day you may need to kill someone in order to go home,” he wrote in a 2008 article.
He exemplifies the increasingly militarized police forces in the United States, especially as more veterans return from ugly wars and look for work in the poor economy. He seems to have brought what he learned in the killing fields of Iraq into the streets of Santa Rosa. But who is “the enemy,” and who are the “bad guys” here?
Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch asked for patience in a recent press release. But the public demands more than patience. It continues to mount a non-violent campaign for justice. After the killing of African-American children in the South, Martin Luther King was not patient and did not back off. He came forward with more than patience–with determination and peaceful direct action.
Sonoma County resident Shepherd Bliss teaches college part-time, farms, and is a member of the Veterans Writing Group.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

1 COMMENT

  1. Excellent reporting, insightful and implying a bigger picture of
    racism and a sub-culture of militarism that has been trained to kill coming home. Police brutality is a big problem that is not going away.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune