Autoworker retiree healthcare: “You mean we didn’t get anything”

Latest

John Williams, Chairperson UAW Region 1 Retiree Council, participates in a demonstration against cuts to the safety-net in Michigan.  PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM
John Williams, Chairperson UAW Region 1 Retiree Council, participates in a demonstration against cuts to the safety-net in Michigan.
PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM

DETROIT, MI—The UAW Voluntary Employee Beneficiaries Association (VEBA) in the end is just a hoard of money disconnected from production.  That hoard must be gambled on penny stocks and junk bonds in the hope of hitting it lucky.  That is the consequence of UAW autoworker retiree healthcare being permanently separated from UAW contract obligations and the corporate accounting regulations governed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
How we got here
In December of 1992, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a rule that all publically traded companies must account for retiree health care benefits on an accrual basis.  They must carry all of their future retiree health care costs on their books at the present day cost as an imaginary liability.
In 2005, the UAW was confronted with this imaginary liability created in 1992 and the 2003 contract was reopened.  The UAW agreed to GM and Ford’s offer to begin funding internal VEBAs at those companies in order to eventually shed themselves of their contractual obligation to provide healthcare for their retirees.
The 2007 contract resulted in the underfunded VEBA that would open its doors on January 1, 2010, the freezing of wages and pension benefits for employees hired before September 27, 2007 and no pension or retiree healthcare benefits for employees hired on or after that date.  In addition, the two-tier wage system was established in order to increase their profits.  And the UAW agreed to never negotiate for the retirees in the future.
VEBA and the Great Recession.
Early in 2009, Congress and the Administration demanded that the UAW reopen the 2007 contracts at all three companies and accept 50% of the underfunded VEBA in company stock in exchange for the partial nationalization of the GM.
Before the ink dried, GM and Chrysler filed for bankruptcy.  All three companies began shedding their overcapacity. GM ownership transferred to the Government and the GM VEBA.  Chrysler ownership was transferred to Fiat and the Chrysler VEBA.  And the Ford VEBA received 50% of its funding in the form of Ford stock. This increased burden of underfunding is making it even more cash poor.
In the 2011 contract negotiations with the auto companies, no funding gains to the VEBA were achieved.  The company waived the 2007 agreement with the union— NO MORE BARGAINING FOR RETIREES.
In the words of one retiree after the 2011 contracts were ratified: “You mean we didn’t get anything?”
There is an alternative
The healthcare of all of us, not just UAW auto retirees, is being separated from production to increase profitability.  We are in a period of economic transformation. Machines that made us more productive are being replaced by machines that produce with little or no human labor involved.
We must support an independent political direction for a new social relationship based on production and distribution for the general wellbeing of everyone and not the select few owners of the new means of production.

+ Articles by this author

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Chicagoans Vow to Fight Trump’s Attack on Immigrant Workers

Chicagoans are showing that they plan to resist President Trump’s plans to mount attacks on immigrants.

A Mass Movement Will Rise to Defend Immigrants, Says Activist

Right now there is no coordinated national mass movement to defend immigrants, but there will be, says human rights activist Camilo Pérez-Bustillo in this interview with the People's Tribune.

L.A. Fires: Climate Campaigners Say ‘Big Oil Did This’

Climate campaigners said blame for the catastrophe in L.A. ultimately lies with the mega-profitable oil and gas giants that have spent decades  knowingly fueling the crisis.

Collective Defense of Immigrant Rights is Key, Says Advocate

In this interview with the People's Tribune, Pedro Rios, director of the AFSC's US/Mexico Border Program, describes the likely shape of Trump's planned immigration crackdown, and how people are organizing to resist it.

US Workers Won Key Victories in 2024, But Hard Fight Lies Ahead

With strikes and the threat of strikes, workers did more than forestall concessions: They gained ground. With Trump, expect attacks on unions, safety regulations, and the very idea of labor law..

More from the People's Tribune