“Healthcare for Some” is the strategy of the few

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
A participant at the Martin Luther King Day celebration in Detroit, MI. He is one of many who are waiting for “Healthcare for all.” PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM
A participant at the Martin Luther King Day celebration in Detroit, MI. He is one of many who are waiting for “Healthcare for all.”
PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM

DETROIT — Business in this country has always supported healthcare for some of us when it benefits business profits.  It never benefited all of us and business does not support any healthcare system that will.
In 1789 the Federal government established the Marine Hospital Service for sick and injured seamen.  This healthcare service grew out of the need for the owners of merchant ships engaged in foreign trade (for instance, cotton produced by slaves to British textile mills and finished textile goods to the United States) to keep their hired crews healthy.  It was funded by a payroll tax on those crews to fund the construction of a series of publicly owned hospitals in the major ports to provide healthcare for those crews, but more importantly to isolate and treat contagious diseases.
Its name was changed in 1902 to the “Public Health and Marine Hospital Service,” and again in 1912 to just the “Public Health Service,” and its primary mission became the isolation and treatment of contagious diseases.
The Civil War caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, a healthcare and a political crisis on the level of a contagious disease.  This led to construction of the racially segregated National Asylum for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers (NHDVS) in 1865 for long-term care of those veterans. It was renamed the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers in 1873.  Between 1865 and 1930, 11 National Homes were built and eventually became the basis for the Veterans Administration (VA) in 1930.  The implementation of the Medicare program in 1966 propelled the elimination of all official forms of racial segregation in hospitals. But, today there are 350,000 veterans waiting for healthcare from the VA.
After WWII, the federal government excluded from income and Social Security taxes the cost of medical insurance provided by private employers to their workers.  The purpose was to provide employers with a healthy workforce to meet the profitable demand of rebuilding the productive capacities of Western Europe and Japan.
From the early 1980s and beyond, western Europe and Japan turned from a profitable market to global competitors.  This was the beginning of the drive for productivity through labor replacing technology (robotics) rather than labor expansion and intensification, which marked the previous 40 years.
The need for a healthy labor force declined and the tactic had to change.  The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the tactic for transferring the responsibility for medical insurance from the employer to the employee in order to increase profits.  It is about reorganizing healthcare for the corporations.
Healthcare for All is the strategy of the many
Healthcare for All is not a reform of Healthcare for Some.  It is a strategy to establish a healthcare system to meet the healthcare needs of everyone in this country. Healthcare for Some is incompatible with that. The Republicans and Democrats will not fight for Healthcare for All because they are controlled by the corporations.  It will take an independent political movement and the end of a system based on the profit of the few to achieve Healthcare for All.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune