Evicted in Googleville

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Monica Perez begins to move her few possessions from the homeless encampment known as Googleville in San Jose, CA. She has lived and worked in San Jose for over thirty years, but now has no place to go.
PHOTO/SANDY PERRY

 
SAN JOSE, CA — CalTrans recently evicted residents of San Jose’s largest homeless encampment since the “Jungle” in a massive sweep on the morning of February 5. Community supporters rallied to protest the action, faulting local and state officials for failing to address the root causes of the homelessness crisis, despite the area’s enormous wealth held by tech companies like Google.
Some named the Felipe Road encampment “Googleville” in order to highlight the tech industry’s irresponsibility in the face of Silicon Valley’s ongoing humanitarian emergency. A system that increases homelessness while its corporations grow radically richer is unsustainable, and must be resisted not only by those directly affected, but by all people of conscience and good will.
The United Nations Special Rapporteur, Leilani Farha, recently visited the Bay Area and called California’s criminalization of the homeless and repeated forced removals a form of “systemic cruelty”, worse than what she has witnessed in cities like Jakarta, Manila, and Mexico City.
“UNBELIEVABLE,” wrote Pastor Scott Wagers a few days later. “After church service, I got a couple of urgent calls and texts that the people who were displaced from the Googleville encampment are now literally living on the sidewalk along the fence that separates state property from city property. So, after hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent to remove our friends from the camp and remove (or destroy) their belongings, most of the people have moved about 20 feet from where they were before. This is true madness and I’ve been watching it for too long. Sorry, too many people are watching and too many people are on the streets… NO ONE is being fooled anymore.”
America could easily end homelessness tomorrow. The government needs to turn over some of the hundreds of thousands of government-owned and corporate-owned vacant homes for people to live in.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune