History’s lesson for midterm elections: We need moral firmness, not “moderate” caution

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Striking teachers in Oklahoma.
PHOTO/FACEBOOK

 
Our country is in crisis. Scenes of children crying at the border have shocked every decent person. Millions are wondering how to end the toxic regime that produced this outrage and so many others.
More than a century ago, small children were also being snatched from their mothers—by slave owners. Before the Civil War, there was an intense debate about how to respond. Some Northern leaders urged voters to elect “moderates” who would accommodate Southern slaveholders.
In 1831, William Lloyd Garrison founded an anti-slavery newspaper – The Liberator. In his very first editorial, he declared that on the subject of slavery: “I do not wish to think or speak, or write, with moderation. No! No! Tell a man whose house is on fire to give a moderate alarm … but urge me not to use moderation.”
Wendell Phillips—America’s greatest orator against slavery—pointed out that society needed someone as impassioned as Garrison to counter the fanatical zeal of slavery’s leading apologist, John C. Calhoun. “[Calhoun and Garrison] are chemical equals,” Phillips explained. “In the 19th century, every attempt to compromise with the slaveocracy degraded the free states and eventually flopped. A national political party built on a shaky alliance between Northern business and Southern plantation owners tore itself apart over slavery. The fate of that apparatus—the Whig Party—should serve as a warning to us today. The nitric acid of today’s oppression cannot be washed away with the cologne water of “centrism.” If the new forces fighting for universal health care, free public education, and an end to attacks on immigrants cannot be heard inside the old institutions, those forces have every right to forge something new, just like the opponents of slavery spurned by the Whig Party created a new institution—the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln.
For more information about history’s lessons for election battles today, check out the educational on the People’s Tribune website: www.peoplestribune.org

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune