Declaring the Pandemic Over Will Hurt Families

Latest

With Biden’s declaration that the public health emergency will end as of May 11, 27 million people will lose their health insurance, one-third of them children. PHOTO/Flickr.

Editor’s note: The editorial below originally appeared in El Tribuno del Pueblo, bilingual sister publication to the People’s Tribune. Visit El Tribuno’s website at tribunodelpueblo.org.

Though the Covid-19 pandemic is not over, many behave as though it is. This includes elected officials, much of the public, and even many health officials, as the CDC has assured us things are getting better. President Biden has extended the declaration of a public health emergency until May 11. This was done because of the appearance of highly transmissible Covid variants, rising Covid hospitalizations and deaths, and the onslaught of the “tripled emic” of Covid, influenza, and RSV (respiratory syncytial virus).

What is most worrisome about President Biden’s announcement is its decoupling from measures that ensure millions of Americans access to health insurance such as Medicaid. As part of the relief package in the CARES Act of March 2020, up to 90 million people enrolled in Medicaid. This directly benefited the record numbers of suddenly unemployed Americans who lost their health insurance almost overnight, joined the ranks of those who have never had health insurance, and of those living in states that never allowed Medicaid in the first place. Even before the pandemic, the medical debt had been the main cause of personal bankruptcy and food and housing insecurity.

Now states are beginning the process of removing people from Medicaid. In addition to that, millions will lose monthly benefits of enhanced food stamp benefits beginning at the end of February of this year. All of this is happening despite strong evidence accumulated during the pandemic that having access to health care and food security benefits the most vulnerable and saves lives. Some states have been extending Medicaid for mothers for up to a year and a half because doing so reduces maternal and infant mortality. Fruit and vegetable access during the pandemic further improved child health and reduced hospitalizations.

We might ask why this change of policy. Is it that the government can no longer afford to protect and care for the American people? There are two facts that show this is not the case. First, the group that benefited the most from government largesse were the billionaires. Three out of four billionaires in the U.S. had increases in their net worths. Sixteen are worth twice what they were before the pandemic. A significant portion of government relief funds went to large companies. All of this occurred while most Americans suffered want and insecurity, amidst massive layoffs and business closures.

Second, an editorial from the British Medical Journal has shown that providing a basic level of economic security (called universal basic income) has significant health benefits. Providing a basic income in eight African countries and six Latin American countries showed substantial reductions in short-term poverty and improvements in physical health, mental health, and nutrition.

Rising inequality and drastic changes in the labor market forced governments to investigate economic initiatives, such as basic income programs, even before the pandemic. Women and children have been the biggest casualties of the deepening divide between wealth and poverty. The effort to address the inequalities was accelerated by the destruction wreaked by Covid-19 on the world’s health and economies.

In this light, we can assess what is happening in the United States. The stimulus checks many Americans received, liberalization of health coverage with expanded access to Medicaid, and other measures of the CARES Act were in fact a form of universal basic income. However, we can see that in the design and implementation, the wealthy were the primary intended beneficiaries.

Whether initially intended as a “trickle-down” stimulation of the economy, it is clear that now that the spigot is being turned off for working-class Americans, the government is serving the corporations and the wealthy at our expense. It is not a question of there not being enough money. It is a question of will, and whom the government serves.

+ Articles by this author

The People’s Tribune opens its pages to voices of the movement for change. Our articles are written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Articles entitled “From the Editors” reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement for change. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff. The People’s Tribune is a 501C4 organization.

1 COMMENT

  1. great article. thank you for your clear statement on how the government is not taking care of its people. especially now that the pandemic is ‘over’. its not like they even took care of us during the pandemic anyway!

Comments are closed.

Featured

Government Charges Man ICE Shot In Back With Assault

In the case of Wilber Rafael Garces Perez, the Venezuelan immigrant who was shot in the back by an ICE agent in Austin September 20, the government has now charged him with assaulting a federal officer. He is still being denied the surgery he needs to remove a bullet from his body.

People Keep Dying in ICE Custody. 13 Dems Back a Bill to Abolish the Agency

Legislation has been introduced called the Melt ICE Act which would dismantle ICE by ending the Department of Homeland Security’s authority to surveil and jail immigrants and redirect its funding to navigate a spiraling affordability crisis.

Resistance is Challenging Grip of AIPAC on Congress

The pro-Israel AIPAC lobby is one of the most powerful lobbies in the country, but its influence over our elections and Congress is increasingly being challenged by candidates and voters.

Angie Nixon, Senate Candidate for Florida, Resolves Capitol Protest Case

Florida US Senate candidate Angie Dixon is no longer facing a prison sentence, having resolving resolved the case brought against her by Florida authorities, after she was arrested for trying to meet with Florida's governor about their redistricting plan.

ICE Shooting of Austin Delivery Man Sparks Outrage

Austin shooting came 10 weeks after ICE agent fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston, whch followed a series of shootings involving ICE, including the killing of US citizens Renée Good and Alex Pretti in MN. Austin community protests arose immediately with renewed calls to Abolish ICE.

More from the People's Tribune