Press Freedom Groups: Biden Must Drop Push to Extradite Assange

Latest

portrait of Julian Assange
Portrait of Julian Assange by Joe Blank, from a Facebook post.

Editor’s note: This article originally appeared at Common Dreams, and is used here under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.

Press freedom groups on June 8 said that following the United Kingdom High Court’s rejection of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s appeal against his extradition order to the United States, U.S. President Joe Biden has a choice to make: continue with the federal case against the publisher or stand on the side of journalists everywhere and drop the charges against Assange.

High Court Judge Jonathan Swift on June 6 handed down the decision rejecting Assange’s appeal of an extradition order that was signed a year ago by U.K. Home Secretary Priti Patel, leaving Assange’s legal team with less than a week to submit another appeal to a panel of two judges.

The judges could convene a public hearing on the case of Assange, who has been charged in the U.S. with violating the 1917 Espionage Act for publishing classified military documents that revealed the United States’ alleged war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Press freedom and human rights groups have maintained that Assange has been prosecuted for publicizing government information just as newspapers routinely do and have demanded that the White House drop the charges.

“The idea of Assange or anyone being tried in a U.S. court for obtaining and publishing confidential documents the same way investigative reporters do every day should be terrifying to all Americans,” said Seth Stern, director of advocacy for Freedom of the Press Foundation. “It’s time for Biden to drop this case and show the world he’s serious about press freedom.”

The Daily Mail reported June 8 that the U.K. Home Office is currently preparing paperwork to rapidly extradite Assange and that he could be sent to the U.S. “in the next few weeks.”

Human rights lawyer Stella Assange, who is married to the WikiLeaks publisher, said Assange will “make a renewed application for appeal to the High Court.”

“We remain optimistic that we will prevail and that Julian will not be extradited to the United States where he faces charges that could result in him spending the rest of his life in a maximum security prison for publishing true information that revealed war crimes committed by the U.S. government,” she said.

Assange’s extradition was originally blocked in 2021 when a Westminster Magistrate Court judge ruled that he should not be sent to the U.S. because of the risk that being held in an American maximum security prison would pose to Assange’s mental health.

The High Court overturned that ruling after the U.S. claimed Assange would not be held in highly restrictive prison conditions.

Christophe Deloire, secretary-general of Reporters Without Borders (RSF), denounced the continued prosecution of Assange as “judicial harassment” and “an attack on global media freedom.”

Along with the possibility of a ruling by the High Court in Assange’s favor, the European Court of Human Rights could block the extradition following the journalist’s appeal to the court last year.

Rebecca Vincent, director of campaigns for RSF, called on Biden to take action instead of leaving it up to British and European judges, in order to end a case that could “land Julian Assange in prison for the rest of his life and permanently impact the climate for journalism around the world.”

“The historical weight of what happens next cannot be overstated,” said Vincent. “It is time to put a stop to this relentless targeting of Assange and act instead to protect journalism and press freedom. Our call on President Biden is now more urgent than ever: Drop these charges, close the case against Assange, and allow for his release without further delay.”

+ Articles by this author

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Chicagoans Vow to Fight Trump’s Attack on Immigrant Workers

Chicagoans are showing that they plan to resist President Trump’s plans to mount attacks on immigrants.

A Mass Movement Will Rise to Defend Immigrants, Says Activist

Right now there is no coordinated national mass movement to defend immigrants, but there will be, says human rights activist Camilo Pérez-Bustillo in this interview with the People's Tribune.

L.A. Fires: Climate Campaigners Say ‘Big Oil Did This’

Climate campaigners said blame for the catastrophe in L.A. ultimately lies with the mega-profitable oil and gas giants that have spent decades  knowingly fueling the crisis.

Collective Defense of Immigrant Rights is Key, Says Advocate

In this interview with the People's Tribune, Pedro Rios, director of the AFSC's US/Mexico Border Program, describes the likely shape of Trump's planned immigration crackdown, and how people are organizing to resist it.

US Workers Won Key Victories in 2024, But Hard Fight Lies Ahead

With strikes and the threat of strikes, workers did more than forestall concessions: They gained ground. With Trump, expect attacks on unions, safety regulations, and the very idea of labor law..

More from the People's Tribune