The CARE Court: A Primer

Judges Can Decide if You're Competent

Latest

A handcuffed evicted Santa Cruz Benchland’s camper is escorted to a squad car by a police officer. An unhoused person is a prime candidate for the CARE Courts.
A handcuffed evicted Santa Cruz Benchland’s camper is escorted to a squad car by a police officer. An unhoused person is a prime candidate for the CARE Courts. Photo/Gloria A Lightheart

In September of 2022, CA Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 1338, creating a mental health court. The Community Assistance Recovery & Empowerment (CARE) court program empowers a judge to compel people with mental health disabilities or substance abuse issues to accept psychiatric treatment and medication against their will. The state Senate voted 38 to 0 in favor.

A court-appointed conservator would make financial and health care decisions and control a patient’s medication and treatment — powerful brain-altering drugs delivered initially at an involuntary temporary stay in a residential psychiatric facility. Could this be the housing promised by Gov. Newsom when he announced his CARE Court plan?

The CARE Court is opposed by more than 40 advocates for unhoused people, legal, civil rights, human rights, and disability rights groups, including Human Rights Watch and the ACLU, who has called the conservatorship “. . . the greatest deprivation of civil liberties aside from the death penalty.” Set up by undeclared presidential candidate Newsom to get the unhoused off the streets, CARE Court is backed by the Big City Mayor’s Coalition, including San Francisco Mayor London Breed and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan.

But one need not be unhoused nor mentally ill, nor a substance abuser to qualify for being hauled into CARE Court, even if you haven’t committed a crime and are not a danger to yourself or others. First, a petition must be filed with the Court by “specified individuals” such as a relative, community member or police officer, and backed by a signed affidavit from a behavioral clinician diagnosing you as suffering from schizophrenia or other psychosis. If you insist you are sane, you might be suffering from “anosognosia,” or lack of awareness that you are ill, according to the Schizophrenia & Psychosis Action Alliance, which preaches “compassionate involuntary intervention.”

Ultimately, it is up to the CARE Court judge to speculate whether you have the decision-making capacity for your own medical care, depriving you of your right to self-determination.

Lawsuits are pending. Stay tuned.

+ Articles by this author

Gloria A Lightheart was herself homeless for over seven years. Now living in subsidized housing, she continues to fight for the rights of the houseless.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

1 COMMENT

  1. Psychiatric drugs against one’s will sounds like a form of torture. This law has circumvented the ‘informed consent’ rule we hear of in health care. This extremely broad law should frighten nearly everyone.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Chicagoans Vow to Fight Trump’s Attack on Immigrant Workers

Chicagoans are showing that they plan to resist President Trump’s plans to mount attacks on immigrants.

A Mass Movement Will Rise to Defend Immigrants, Says Activist

Right now there is no coordinated national mass movement to defend immigrants, but there will be, says human rights activist Camilo Pérez-Bustillo in this interview with the People's Tribune.

L.A. Fires: Climate Campaigners Say ‘Big Oil Did This’

Climate campaigners said blame for the catastrophe in L.A. ultimately lies with the mega-profitable oil and gas giants that have spent decades  knowingly fueling the crisis.

Collective Defense of Immigrant Rights is Key, Says Advocate

In this interview with the People's Tribune, Pedro Rios, director of the AFSC's US/Mexico Border Program, describes the likely shape of Trump's planned immigration crackdown, and how people are organizing to resist it.

US Workers Won Key Victories in 2024, But Hard Fight Lies Ahead

With strikes and the threat of strikes, workers did more than forestall concessions: They gained ground. With Trump, expect attacks on unions, safety regulations, and the very idea of labor law..

More from the People's Tribune