‘Drop Charges Against Woman Who Suffered Miscarriage,’ Say Ohio Doctors

Nobody should be criminalized for their pregnancy outcomes

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Brittany Watts, 33, was charged with a felony in the state of Ohio after suffering an agonizing miscarriage. The hospital informed police who searched her toilet following her miscarriage and found the fetus. Screen Shot, Video Still, WOT11

‘A prosecutor in Trumbull County, Ohio is “under no legal obligation” to prosecute Brittany Watts, said an advocacy group.’

Joined by national reproductive rights groups, a physician-led advocacy organization in Ohio is pushing a county prosecutor to drop a felony charge against Brittany Watts, a woman who suffered a miscarriage in September, saying it’s entirely in the attorney’s power to stop a grand jury case—in which the odds are stacked against the defendant—from moving forward.

Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights (OPRR) wrote to Trumbull County Prosecutor Dennis Watkins, a Democrat, to refute his claim that he is obligated to charge Watts with abuse of a corpse and to bring the case to a grand jury.

The group pointed out that nearly 100 elected prosecutors from across the U.S., including two in Ohio, said in a joint statement after Roe v. Wade was overturned in June 2022 that “prosecutors are entrusted with immense discretion” when deciding to pursue criminal charges.

“Prosecutors make decisions every day about how to allocate limited resources and which cases to prosecute,” said the June 2022 statement. “Indeed, our communities have entrusted us to use our best judgment in deciding how and if to leverage the criminal legal system to further the safety and well-being of all, and we are ethically bound to pursue those interests in every case.”

With that in mind, said OPRR, Watkins is “under no legal obligation” to prosecute Watts.

“As has been widely publicized and as you well know, but choose to ignore, the principle of prosecutorial discretion is well established in both federal and Ohio law,” the group’s letter reads.

The case stems from a miscarriage Watts suffered at home in September, after she had experienced pain and passed blood clots at 22 weeks of pregnancy. Doctors at a local hospital told her the pregnancy was not viable despite some cardiac activity, but Watts was forced to wait several days for an ethics panel to determine whether the hospital could induce labor under Ohio law. The state currently permits abortion care until 22 weeks of pregnancy, but the state has claimed it can enforce a six-week ban that has been blocked by preliminary injunction.

Watts eventually had the miscarriage in her bathroom, and police got involved in the case after she told a nurse at the hospital that she had taken the tissue, fluid, and blood in her toilet and placed it in a bucket. The authorities investigated and found Watts’ fetus, which weighed less than one pound, in a pipe connected to the toilet.

Mini Timmaraju, president and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, told MSNBC on Wednesday night that prosecutors are punishing Watts for doctors’ inability to make a decision about providing her with medical attention in the United States’ post-Roe political climate.

“She should be treated with compassion, with dignity, with care, but because of this climate and environment we’re in now,” said Timmaraju, “this is the America that has been wrought.”

The grand jury is investigating Watts’ case and is expected to vote on whether to indict her in the coming weeks, unless Watkins drops the charge.

If the case proceeds, Watts could be called to testify before the grand jury, but she would not be granted legal representation and Watkins’ office would not be required to present any information that could help the defendant’s case. In Trumbull County, Watkins noted in a recent memo, grand juries decide against indicting defendants in only about 20% of cases.

Watts could face up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine if she is found guilty.

“Prosecuting people for miscarriage doesn’t improve public health or safety,” said If/When/How, a national network of reproductive rights lawyers, earlier this month. “Instead, it means locking someone up, separating families, and dire financial harm to them.”

View original article at https://www.commondreams.org/news/brittany-watts-ohio. Common Dream’s work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune