Billionaire-Funded Group Attacks Democracy Across US

Group aims to make ballot initiatives harder to pass

Latest

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Chicago group rallies voters to the polls, 2022. Video Still, youtube.com

Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared in Common Dreams and can be viewed at https://www.commondreams.org/news/billionaire-funding-attack-democracy

When Ohio voters go to the polls in August for a special election to decide on the threshold needed to pass a constitutional referendum, they will be voting on whether to weaken direct democracy in their own state—but the push to do so is coming in large part from a Florida-based right-wing group whose biggest donor is Illinois billionaire Richard Uihlein.

As The Guardian reported Thursday, the Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA) originally focused its efforts on influencing state policy but in recent months has testified, issued legal memos, and posted on social media about proposals in a number of states to raise the threshold needed to amend state constitutions by referendum.

Uihlein, a key promoter and funder of lies about the 2020 presidential election, has donated $17.6 million to FGA since 2014, contributing to its efforts regarding ballot initiatives as well as its attempts to block ranked-choice voting in states and towns and ban outside financial support for under-resourced election offices.

In Ohio, Arkansas, South Dakota, and other states the FGA has promoted the passage of requirements for a supermajority—rather than a simple majority—to enact ballot initiatives. In Ohio, Republican legislators have pushed for a 60% majority to amend the state constitution, with the GOP aiming to impose the new rules before the November election in order to thwart the passage of an amendment codifying abortion rights in the state.

FGA and its lobbying arm, the Opportunity Solutions Project (OSP), have lobbied lawmakers, testified, and taken other steps to promote the passage of supermajority requirements in at least four states, The Guardian reported.

“Claims about protecting our constitution from outside influence fall flat when the effort is itself supported by more than $1 million of ads paid for by Illinois billionaire Richard Uihlein.”

When Republicans in Ohio first proposed the new voting threshold requirement, the only person who testified in favor of the rule was a representative of the OSP. The group argued that the supermajority requirement would “make it more difficult for out-of-state billionaires and dark money groups,” a claim that the editorial board of the Dayton Daily News found dubious earlier this month as it called on voters to oppose the measure in the August election.

“Claims about protecting our constitution from outside influence fall flat when the effort is itself supported by more than $1 million of ads paid for by Illinois billionaire Richard Uihlein,” wrote the board.

Uihlein donated $1.1 million in the last year to the Save Our Constitution PAC, whose ads called on state lawmakers to support a higher threshold requirement to change the state constitution.

The Statehouse News Bureau in Ohio reported in April that “Uihlein’s big donation is just the first installment in the effort to push the amendment,” suggesting the billionaire plans to spend more ahead of the August special election.

The Guardian noted that despite Uihlein’s bankrolling of FGA and OSP, the organizations have not been successful in all its efforts to gut direct democracy.

OSP published an op-ed, a fact sheet, and social media content calling for the passage last year of Issue 2, which would have required all ballot initiatives to garner at least 60% of the vote to pass. The group spent at least $65,000 on the campaign, but Arkansas voters rejected the measure by 19 percentage points.

The Dayton Daily News editorial board advised Ohioans to do the same last week.

“Very simply, Issue 1 [in the August special election] is about taking power away from you,” wrote the board. “Don’t disarm yourselves of the ‘greatest tools democracy ever had.'”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Free to republish but please credit the People's Tribune. Visit us at www.peoplestribune.org, email peoplestribune@gmail.com, or call 773-486-3551.

The People’s Tribune brings you articles written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Unsigned articles reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: ©2024 peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

Supreme Court Dismantles Federal Regulation of Business

Recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the floodgates to allow corporate interests, in the name of profit, to dismantle the system of federal regulation that protects our rights and wellbeing.

Campaign to Debunk the Lies about Migrants and Refugees

Join a campaign to combat the mainstream lies and shine a moral light on the truth: that no human being is illegal, and seeking asylum is a human right.

U.S. Supreme Court’s Criminalization of Homeless Met with Universal Disgust

A movement is growing against the latest “legalized” atrocity on the most vulnerable, in governments, among advocates, ordinary people, and most importantly, by organized and individual homeless people. As said in the homeless movement, “We only get what we are organized to take!”

Project 2025: Far Right’s Plan to Demolish Immigration Threatens All of Us

The right-wing Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, billed as a policy playbook for a second Trump administration, includes provisions that would demolish the existing immigration system and set the stage for mass deportations.

Supreme Court Rules Arresting, Citing People for Not Having Shelter is Constitutional

Criminalizing the homeless for sleeping in public spaces when having no other option does not violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of U.S. Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, according to new ruling.

More from the People's Tribune