“Healthcare for Some” is the strategy of the few

Latest

A participant at the Martin Luther King Day celebration in Detroit, MI. He is one of many who are waiting for “Healthcare for all.” PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM
A participant at the Martin Luther King Day celebration in Detroit, MI. He is one of many who are waiting for “Healthcare for all.”
PHOTO/DAYMONJHARTLEY.COM

DETROIT — Business in this country has always supported healthcare for some of us when it benefits business profits.  It never benefited all of us and business does not support any healthcare system that will.
In 1789 the Federal government established the Marine Hospital Service for sick and injured seamen.  This healthcare service grew out of the need for the owners of merchant ships engaged in foreign trade (for instance, cotton produced by slaves to British textile mills and finished textile goods to the United States) to keep their hired crews healthy.  It was funded by a payroll tax on those crews to fund the construction of a series of publicly owned hospitals in the major ports to provide healthcare for those crews, but more importantly to isolate and treat contagious diseases.
Its name was changed in 1902 to the “Public Health and Marine Hospital Service,” and again in 1912 to just the “Public Health Service,” and its primary mission became the isolation and treatment of contagious diseases.
The Civil War caused hundreds of thousands of casualties, a healthcare and a political crisis on the level of a contagious disease.  This led to construction of the racially segregated National Asylum for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers (NHDVS) in 1865 for long-term care of those veterans. It was renamed the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers in 1873.  Between 1865 and 1930, 11 National Homes were built and eventually became the basis for the Veterans Administration (VA) in 1930.  The implementation of the Medicare program in 1966 propelled the elimination of all official forms of racial segregation in hospitals. But, today there are 350,000 veterans waiting for healthcare from the VA.
After WWII, the federal government excluded from income and Social Security taxes the cost of medical insurance provided by private employers to their workers.  The purpose was to provide employers with a healthy workforce to meet the profitable demand of rebuilding the productive capacities of Western Europe and Japan.
From the early 1980s and beyond, western Europe and Japan turned from a profitable market to global competitors.  This was the beginning of the drive for productivity through labor replacing technology (robotics) rather than labor expansion and intensification, which marked the previous 40 years.
The need for a healthy labor force declined and the tactic had to change.  The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is the tactic for transferring the responsibility for medical insurance from the employer to the employee in order to increase profits.  It is about reorganizing healthcare for the corporations.
Healthcare for All is the strategy of the many
Healthcare for All is not a reform of Healthcare for Some.  It is a strategy to establish a healthcare system to meet the healthcare needs of everyone in this country. Healthcare for Some is incompatible with that. The Republicans and Democrats will not fight for Healthcare for All because they are controlled by the corporations.  It will take an independent political movement and the end of a system based on the profit of the few to achieve Healthcare for All.

+ Articles by this author

The People’s Tribune opens its pages to voices of the movement for change. Our articles are written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Articles entitled “From the Editors” reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: peoplestribune.orgPlease donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement for change. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff. The People’s Tribune is a 501C4 organization.

Featured

ICE Shooting of Man in Austin Sparks Outrage

Austin shooting came 10 weeks after ICE agent fatally shot Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston, whch followed a series of shootings involving ICE, including the killing of US citizens Renée Good and Alex Pretti in MN. Austin community protests arose immediately with renewed calls to Abolish ICE.

Americans Have No Constitutional Right to Clean Drinking Water Ruled Appellate Court

Americans do not have the constitutional right to clean drinking water, ruled the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, following a lawsuit alleging the negligence of the City of Jackson resulted in children having lead poisoning.

Musk Builds Polluting Data Centers in Poorest Black Communities

Tennessee State Rep. Justin Pearson asks, “Why aren’t we making polluters pay for being in Memphis and Shelby County?”

Labor Day Thoughts

On this Labor Day, 2026, workers all over the country continue the fight for unions and labor rights for all. Videos in this article illustrate some of the battles that have been won and those that continue to be fought out today.

Black Pregnant Congresswoman Could Face Prison for Challenging ICE

As a result of a chaotic scene that occurred when federal agents attempted to keep the official delegation from entering the Delaney Detention Center to inspect it, Congresswoman McIver, who is pregnant, faces 17 years in prison if convicted of the assault charges the U.S. government has issued against her.

More from the People's Tribune