The struggle for affirmative action

Latest

Editor’s note: This is part two of a two-part article.
NORTH LITTLEROCK, ARK — In an effort to revamp the centuries of discrimination in education and employment that existed between Blacks and whites, affirmative action became a federal project. Arthur Fletcher, political activist and consultant, created the idea.  In time, affirmative action was expected to “level the playing field” by helping minorities acquire positions that had traditionally excluded them.  If a Black person or other minority applied for a position, and that person had the same qualifications as a white person applying for the same job, then the Back person or other minority would be given preference. This program produced a reasonable amount of success; however, it was never completely effective.  Whatever diversity now exists can be contributed to the affirmative action legislation.
Support for affirmative action began to wane in the late 1970’s.  Some called it reverse discrimination, but if one were to put reverse discrimination on one side of the scales of justice and put the realities of slavery and its aftermath on the other, the scale would overwhelmingly show the greater importance of affirmative action.  It was the only plan to help America right the many ghastly wrongs that had kept a huge segment of the population as less than second-class citizens.
It has been said that if one does not remember the lessons of history, history will repeat itself.  If so, this nation will begin to lose the gains it established with affirmative action. In June 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, said that schools cannot assign students to schools based on the skin color of the students, but they were vague about assignment by race.  They did not rule that race cannot ever be considered for school choice.  This ambiguous ruling will be challenged, no doubt America’s epilogue for equal rights in the job market and in schools must continue to have positive results.  Opponents of this historic moral commitment are constantly attacking.  The American public must be vigilant to ensure equality so that this battle will not be fought every generation.

+ Articles by this author

The People’s Tribune opens its pages to voices of the movement for change. Our articles are written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Articles entitled “From the Editors” reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: peoplestribune.orgPlease donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement for change. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff. The People’s Tribune is a 501C4 organization.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Featured

People of the US and World Condemn the Assault on Venezuela

The People's Tribune joins people across the US and the world in denouncing the US attack on Venezuela. Unity, collaboration and coordinated actions, strikes and assemblies are necessary to rein in the US.

The Case for a General Strike and True Solidarity

When working people unite across industries, choosing solidarity over division, the story of labor changes—not just for a contract cycle, but for the nation’s economic and political direction.

Together, We Can Redirect the Whole World

A visionary poem about the world we are living in and how people, together, can create a peaceful, happy world for all.

Stop the Illegal and Immoral War on Venezuela

The US attacks on Venezuela are illegal and immoral, and so is all the other military, economic and political pressure that has been put on Venezuela since 1998. None of this benefits the people of Venezuela or the American people.

Medicare for All Increasingly Popular in Maine and Nationwide

Senate candidate Graham Platner from Maine champions Medicare for all, a program that expands Medicare and guarantees health coverage to all.

More from the People's Tribune