Why we need to end
‘corporate personhood’

More News

An estimated two million people in over 52 countries peacefully took to the streets to say NO to biotech giant Monsanto on May 25, 2013. These protests were in Detroit, MI. Photo/Daymonjhartley.com
An estimated two million people in over 52 countries peacefully took to the streets to say NO to biotech giant Monsanto on May 25, 2013. These protests were in Detroit, MI.
Photo/Daymonjhartley.com

The need for the constitutional amendment against ‘corporate personhood’ advocated by Move to Amend was demonstrated clearly by a recent vote in the U.S. Senate.
On the eve of the late-May worldwide protest against Monsanto, some 71 U.S. senators voted against guaranteeing states the right to enact laws requiring the labeling of foods containing GMOs (genetically modified organisms), part of this year’s farm bill.
They did this despite the fact that 90 percent of the public have made it clear they want labels on foods containing genetically engineered ingredients.
Why would so many senators disregard the desire of 90 percent of their constituents simply to know what’s in the food we eat? Why are they more responsive to the companies that create these Frankenfoods than to the people they are elected to represent?
We all know the answer—it’s money. It takes a ton of money to become a U.S. senator, and the best way to get it is from rich people and giant corporations.
Asked why he robbed banks, the famous Depression-era bank robber, Willie Sutton, famously replied, “Because that’s where the money is.” Our politicians are just as smart as Willie. They know where the money is and how to get it—by becoming good and loyal employees of Global Corp and representing its interests in the halls of government.
That used to be called “taking bribes.” No more. Bribes have been reformulated as “campaign contributions,” and we are not surprised when companies contribute to politicians on both sides of the aisle. That’s “being impartial,” not bribing everyone in sight.
All of this has been enabled by the court-created doctrines of corporate constitutional rights and decision after decision equating money with free speech.
That’s the legal basis for the takeover of our government, our media, our schools—all aspects of our lives—by enormous economic entities that do not have our best interests at heart. Indeed, they have no hearts, one good indicator they are not human beings and shouldn’t have the rights the Constitution reserves for people!
Any successful strategy to end corporate control must address corporate constitutional rights and money as speech. The courts are constantly used to defy the will of the people when it is in conflict with the interests of corporations.
The 2012 debacle around California’s Prop. 37 (to label GMO food) is a prime example. Because the courts have ruled that “money is speech,” the corporations behind the “No on 37” campaign were able to pour $45 million into saturating the airways with false and misleading ads in the month before the election, creating enough confusion to narrowly defeat the proposition.
Move to Amend is the national coalition campaigning for the “We the People” Amendment that establishes that “corporations are not People” and “Money is not Speech.”  A grassroots organization, Move to Amend will help you start an affiliate in your area if there is none already.  For more info, visit www.Movetoamend.org.
Abraham Entin founded the Sonoma County affiliate of Move to Amend.

+ Articles by this author

The People’s Tribune opens its pages to voices of the movement for change. Our articles are written by individuals or organizations, along with our own reporting. Bylined articles reflect the views of the authors. Articles entitled “From the Editors” reflect the views of the editorial board. Please credit the source when sharing: peoplestribune.org. Please donate to help us keep bringing you voices of the movement for change. Click here. We’re all volunteer, no paid staff. The People’s Tribune is a 501C4 organization.

Featured

Listen to the New Song ‘Billionaires’

Billionaires, a song by singer and song writer Chris Buhalis, who says, "I am not on this planet to serve billionaire overlords—and neither are you. Bilionaires are not your fucking friends."

Time to Dream Big and Deliver Big

The midterm elections have dramatically demonstrated what most voters want for a new and vibrant political and economic landscape: How to live and work healthily and strongly without paying through our noses.

Elections: The People Have Spoken Loud and Clear

The midterm election victories were not so much an endorsement of the Democrats as a social revolt against the ongoing assault on the people. The people demanded that their voices be heard and their needs be addressed. There will no doubt be more upheavals to come.

Michigan Senate Race Could Signal Game Changer in Electoral Politics

The world is watching Abdul El-Sayed, candidate for U.S. Senate race in Michigan.

Let Love Be The Uprising

"There is a particular kind of courage in remaining tender when the world rewards brutality," writes poet Sarah Hackney.

More from the People's Tribune